Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gutstein
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the petition to stay arbitration granted.
Under the facts of this case as found by Supreme Court, respondent, who maintained an apartment in Manhattan where he resided more than 80% of the time, is not a covered person entitled to uninsured motorist benefits under his father’s insurance policy. The policy provides such coverage only for a "family member”, defined in the policy as "a person related to [the insured] by blood, marriage or adoption who is a resident of [the insured’s] household”.
A…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Dean v. Tower InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. KowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Government Employees Insurance v. PaolicelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & GaliotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PanettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.