Legal Opinion

United States v. Dudley

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 14, 1995No. NMCM 94 01040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Judge:

In this appeal, we hold that a military suspect’s admission of a crime to a military physician was admissible at trial when the physician’s questions were for diagnostic purposes. This holding applies even though the physician was aware of the individual’s status as a suspect and did not provide appropriate rights warnings. We have also concluded that we are satisfied of the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the sentence is not inappropriately severe. Accordingly, we affirm.

Contrary to his pleas, Petty Officer Dudley was convicted by a general court-martial,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MartinezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API