United States v. Dudley
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DeCICCO, Judge:
In this appeal, we hold that a military suspect’s admission of a crime to a military physician was admissible at trial when the physician’s questions were for diagnostic purposes. This holding applies even though the physician was aware of the individual’s status as a suspect and did not provide appropriate rights warnings. We have also concluded that we are satisfied of the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the sentence is not inappropriately severe. Accordingly, we affirm.
Contrary to his pleas, Petty Officer Dudley was convicted by a general court-martial,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MartinezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017