Behsman v. Behsman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for 'Steele county to annul a marriage. The 'answer alleged the insanity of defendant. The case was tried before Childress, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law found that plaintiff was not entitled to have the marriage annulled, but that he was entitled to the custody of the children. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Plaintiff and defendant have been residents of this state since their birth. They were married in June, 1907. They lived together as husband and wife until shortly prior to September, 1915, when the defendant, by reason of and as a result of epilepsy, was adjudged insane and committed to the hospital where ¡she has since been detained. There are three children the issue of such marriage, of the ages of eight, five and three years, but they do not appear to be afflicted with such malady.
An examination of the record as returned leads us to the conclusion that the trial court was right in…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Lyannes v. LyannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Hempel v. HempelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of KinkeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Robertson v. RothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Richardson v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.