Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 2009No. A07-1168Published

1DissentPage, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In this appeal, the record presented is insufficient for purposes of determining whether the district court abused its discretion when it decided that Jones was ineligible for a public defender.

Under Minn.Stat. § 611.17(a)(2) (2008), a defendant who is financially unable to obtain counsel is entitled to the appointment of a public defender. A defendant is financially unable to obtain counsel if he or she, “through any combination of liquid assets and current income, would be unable to pay the reasonable costs charged by private counsel in that judicial district for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ronald Julian Hanson v. Rick Passer, Chief Executive Officer, Anoka County Adult Detention FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re StuartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API