Legal Opinion

Bell v. Martin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Case.* This cause came before the court on a motion to set aside the verdict, and enter judgment for the defendant, on points reserved by the Chief Justice on the trial at the Circuit; and was argued by

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, delivered by

Hornblower, C. J.

The questions reserved, and which have been argued at the bar are these, viz: First, Was parol evidence, admissible to prove, that the note in question in this case, was one of the several promissory notes referred to in a certain writing, of which the following is a copy, viz: “ New York, 9th Sept. 1837; Received from Geo. W. Tyson & Co. a note at twelve months, dated 15th Feb’y. 1837, signed by S.- C. Barton, Joseph C. English and others, for $4484 71, as collateral security for certain notes we hold of theirs, and on which, we agree to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. McLemore v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Union Bank v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. President of the Bank of United States v. HatchSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AJ Armstrong, Inc. v. Janburt Embroidery Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API