Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 5, 1934No. 10207PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This statement — though prolix — made by the one and adopted by the other of the litigants, correctly reflects the reaches of the cause as presented to this court, except that the life of this “Enabling Act,” which became effective on March 6, 1934 (Acts 1934 [2d Called Sess.] c. 19, §§ 1-9 [Vernon’s Ann. *881Civ. St. art. 165 — 1]), was thus limited in the last clause thereof: “This Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage for a period of two (2) years.” Acts 1934 (2d Called Sess.) e. 19, § 10.
“This suit was filed by the State of Texas at the instance of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Fritter v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. County of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Tom Green County v. ProffittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- McGee v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Suburban Utility Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.