Legal Opinion

Papoutsis v. Trevino

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1942No. 11190PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Gilbert Trevino brought this suit and recovered judgment against Theodore Pa-poutsis and his wife, Reyes Ibarra Papout-sis, who have appealed.

The obvious purpose of appellee in bringing the suit, maintained under the thin veneer of an action for divorce, was to obtain from Reyes Ibarra Papoutsis, his *778claimed wife under an alleged putative marriage, an interest in certain real properties in Bexar and Nueces Counties, to which she held the admitted record title. In the count for divorce Trevino prayed for dissolution of the bonds of an alleged putative common law marriage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. O'Neil v. NortonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Smith v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Kelly v. Consolidated UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curtin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Hupp v. HuppCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Whaley v. PeatCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. In Re Greathouse's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Lovell v. LovellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API