Legal Opinion · Concurrence

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1991No. A91A0729Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge

Although fully concurring in Divisions 1 through 5 and 7, I concur in Division 6 only because defense counsel was not materially hampered in the closing argument. The court advised, “I don’t know what I’m going to charge them until I hear what you argue to the jury.” Then, after counsel stated that alibi was a defense, the court responded, “If you argue it, I’ll charge it.” When counsel added that the other defense was that the incident did not happen, the court acknowledged this with “Yes, sir. If you rely on it, I’ll charge it. I’m going to listen to what you say and I’m going to try to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API