Legal Opinion

Little v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2010No. 08-7095PublishedCited by 436 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Gary Little, an Oklahoma state prisoner, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging the Oklahoma Department of Corrections (“ODOC”) and several employees and officials at the Mack Alford Correctional Center (collectively “defendants”), violated his constitutional rights. Upon defendants’ motion, the district court dismissed Mr. Little’s complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and denied his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND.

I. BACKGROUND

Mr. Little entered the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Aquilar-Avellaveda v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Jernigan v. StuchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by436 opinions

  1. Pacific Radiation Oncology v. the Queen's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Tuckel v. GroverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Ramirez v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  5. Murata MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

431 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API