Legal Opinion

Texas Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Dooley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1936No. 8209PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appellant is a private corporation, “organized and operated for the promotion and advancement of pharmaceutical science and art.” Whether with or without capital stock is not shown. Its membership is composed of the registered pharmacists of Texas. It applied for a mandamus to compel appellees, constituting the Texas State Board of Pharmacy, to turn over to it $9,553, in compliance with the provisions of section 14, chap. 107, Acts 41st Leg., 1929 (see Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.art. 4542a, § 14). The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition, and upon refusal of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Aransas Pass v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bexar County v. LindenTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Road District Number Four v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Board of Governors of West Virginia University v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Friedman v. American Surety Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. City of Corsicana and Navarro CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API