Legal Opinion
Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J. P.
In this appeal we are called upon to determine the import of a dispute resolution clause in a public works contract. The appeal arises out of a construction contract between the appellant Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (hereinafter PATH), and Yonkers Contracting Company, Inc. (hereinafter Yonkers) (Yonkers is also acting on behalf of its subcontractor Franki Northwest Company). Clause 17 of the contract contained the following provision, in pertinent part:
"To resolve all disputes and to prevent litigation the parties to this Contract authorize the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ardsley Construction Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Tufano Contracting Corp. v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Tufano Contracting Corp. v. Port of New York AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc. v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. v. Impact Environmental Engineering, PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ferguson Electric Co. v. Kendal at Ithaca, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.