Arlan Dorman v. Artis Franklin Power

GREENLEE, J.,

SPECIALLY CONCURRING:

¶ 28. The majority opinion correctly finds that the chancellor properly sustained the motion for summary judgment filed by the appellees against Dorman’s claim of fraud committed by Power in procuring a warranty deed from Dorman and Dorman’s claim of adverse possession of the subject real property.

¶ 29. Though possibly not fully brought before the chancery court, a review of the chain of title would reveal another reason that Dorman’s appeal concerning underlying fraud is without merit and that the outcome. of the chancellor’s judgment is appropriate.

¶ 30. In…