Legal Opinion
State v. Street
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 23, 1955No. 217PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The appellant excepts to and assigns as error nine portions of the court’s charge to the jury; all other exceptions have been abandoned.
We deem it necessary and appropriate in the disposition of this appeal to consider the following portions of the charge:
“To illustrate what I mean, if tonight when you put your car in the garage somebody jumps out in the dark and flashes his pistol on you and says he is going to kill you, you have the right to protect yourself and kill him. It might turn out later that the pistol is not loaded, has no cylinder, but you didn’t know it, and you have the right…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . KeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. RawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.