Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

B.J.M. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1993No. 92-1004Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNesbitt, Judge

I concur in affirmance of the summary judgment as it relates to the denial of mandamus. I dissent with the court’s determination that the amended complaint states a cause of action in ordinary negligence. I agree with the court that reversal of the juvenile’s statutory claim, pursuant to section 39.455(2), Florida Statutes (1991), is required but would only do so with leave to amend.

In the present ease, it is undisputed, as the majority recognizes, that HRS was providing services to B.J.M. pursuant to a permanent placement plan established by court order authorized by section 39.452, Florida…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. YamuniSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. DEPT. OF HEALTH REHAB. SERV. v. WhaleySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. City Gas Co. v. Miller Gas Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API