Legal Opinion

Montoya v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided November 21, 2000No. 07-99-0447-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVIS, Justice.

After his plea of not guilty, appellant Eric E. Montoya was convicted by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance in a drug-free zone and punishment was assessed at 10 years confinement. Presenting a sole issue, appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion and committed reversible error by excluding evidence of an agreement between the State and witness Jeremy McDonald in violation of his federal and state right of confrontation of witnesses. Based upon the rationale expressed herein, we affirm.

Because appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Barley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Transportation v. Pate, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  2. State v. WeaverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. David Andrew Schmidt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
  4. David Andrew Schmidt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
  5. Jesus Jose Lacer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API