Legal Opinion

State v. Hiller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1975No. C 74-11-3423 CrPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of promoting gambling in the second degree (ORS 167.122). He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for acquittal. The motion for acquittal was based on the contention that there was no evidence to support the finding of guilt.

ORS 167.122(1) provides that:

“A person commits the crime of promoting gambling in the second degree if he knowingly promotes or profits from unlawful gambling.”

ORS 167.117(9) provides that:

“ ‘Promotes gambling’ means that a person, acting other than as a player, engages in conduct that materially aids any form of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry Transport, Inc. v. HeltzelOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Whitney v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API