Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Iowa Employment Security Commission
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSsiith, J.
We have here to construe the Iowa Employment Security Law in its relation to certain stipulated facts. The self-avowed purpose of the Act is to achieve social security “by encouraging employers to provide more stable employment and by the systematic accumulation of funds during periods of eny ployment to provide benefits for periods of unemployment.” Section 96.2, Iowa Code, 1946. (Italics supplied.)
We are not presently concerned with the elaborate benefit provisions of the statute and the machinery for determining rights of claimants- It is sufficient to say the benefits are payable out of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coggeshall v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Giragi v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Giragi v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Elks v. ConnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Mount Vernon Bank & Trust Co. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Monroe Community School District v. Marion County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Contract Services, Ltd. v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Employment Security Board v. Maryland Deliveries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.