Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Dalrymple
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Conley Byrd, Justice.
For reversal of a judgment upon a jury verdict in this eminent domain action, appellant Arkansas State Highway Commission contends that the trial court erred in refusing to strike veniremen Easterling and Rowe for cause and in refusing to permit dirt sales by appellee Helen B. Dalrymple to a highway construction contractor to be offset as special benefits. We find no error.
Appellant’s challenge to venireman Easterling was made because the voir dire examination showed that he had an opinion of real estate values in the area and because he knew one of the prospective…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mabry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Piggott State Bank v. Pollard Gin Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Ark. State Hwy. Comm. v. A. L. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- National Bank of Commerce v. HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Poet v. Traverse City Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.