Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Hollander

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 5, 1992No. 78896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

607 So.2d 412 (1992)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Bruce Lee HOLLANDER, Respondent.

No. 78896.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 5, 1992.

Rehearing Denied February 16, 1993.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Stephen C. Whalen, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.

Bruce Lee Hollander, pro se.

2Per curiam

This is a lawyer disciplinary hearing in which Bruce Lee Hollander (Hollander) petitions this Court to review the referee's finding of guilt and recommendation of discipline. The referee recommended to this Court that Hollander receive a…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. The Florida Bar v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Faro v. RomaniSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. The Florida Bar v. Jeremy W. AltersSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. Mangel v. Bob Dance Dodge, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Faro v. RomaniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API