Legal Opinion
Wrighter v. A. A. Adams Stores, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 13, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries. The fronts of two stores, or a double store, were to be *352repaired. These premises were upon one of the streets in the city of Binghamton. To do this work it was necessary that a space on the sidewalk should be used by the workmen and to protect the passing public it was necessary that a barrier or false front, as it is called, should be placed on the sidewalk in front of these premises. Application was made to the proper city authority and a permit Was given to erect the false front. This was done in the following manner: A construction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Klepper v. Seymour House Corp. of Ogdensburg, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Uggla v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Metzroth v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schroeder v. City County Savings Bank, AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Rox v. Village of Great NeckNew York District Court · 1959
- Harris v. City of Glen CoveNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Ledbetter v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1949