Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Jarrell

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 27, 1993No. NMCM 92 0370Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFreyer, Senior Judge

(dissenting in part/concurring in the result) *:

The appellant’s conduct in this case, which consisted of climbing down a ladder onto a barge attached aft of his ship in port and slipping therefrom undetected into the water and swimming to the next pier over, falls far short of the conduct described in United States v. Sadinsky, 14 U.S.C.M.A. 563, 34 C.M.R. 343 (1964), and characterized in United States v. Parks, 3 M.J. 591 (N.C.M.R.1977). The circumstances of this case, are in substance, no different than if the appellant had climbed down onto the adjacent pier and thence onto the barge and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. DellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. ParksU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API