Legal Opinion

Roundtree v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 20, 2001No. 3D00-3627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Finding no error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, we affirm the conviction for burglary and theft. See Miller v. State, 403 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Piantadosi v. State, 311 So.2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

However, as correctly conceded by the State, the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as a prison releasee reoffen-der to 15 years mandatory minimum imprisonment for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. See State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, — So.2d —, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. March 22, 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 773 So.2d 1222…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HugginsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Piantadosi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MirandaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API