Legal Opinion
Pisek v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc. Disability Insurance Plan
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided July 17, 2007No. 1:06-cv-00372PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD L. YOUNG, District Judge.
I.Introduction
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff, Peter Pisek (“Plaintiff’), and Defendants, Kindred Healthcare, Inc. Disability Insurance Plan (“Plan”), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (“Kindred”) (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff filed the present lawsuit against Defendants for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Tamyra S. Bowerman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated and Associates' Health and Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Gilbertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Consuela Quinn v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013