Legal Opinion

Powe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 1983No. AP-107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NIMMONS, Judge.

Powe appeals from a drug trafficking conviction. He claims that the trial court erred in admitting, over objection, tape recordings of four telephone conversations between the defendant and one Robert Levesque, an informant who was participating with law enforcement officials in an undercover drug investigation. We affirm after considering this case en banc pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.331(a) and (b).

Two of the calls were placed on October 8, 1980, by Levesque to Powe at his home in Miami. The next day, Powe telephoned Levesque and advised him that he was in Jacksonville prepared…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WelkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API