Legal Opinion
Prince v. Childs Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 9, 1928No. 120PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We can discover no justification for the intervention of Stone, Prosser & Doty. The main suit was to compel the issue to the plaintiff of a certificate for her stock and the payment to her of all unpaid dividends. No alternativo relief was asked to recover damages for conversion, and no attempt was made to ratify the sale of the forged certificate and follow the proceeds. The bill relied solely on an ownership, which had never been divested. Any liability of Stone, Prosser & Doiy to Childs Company, because of a guarani y of the plaintiff’s signature, made…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. Miller & LuxSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philipp v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Beitman v. Correct Care SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Feilbach Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
- Komar v. General Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959