Legal Opinion

Skannal v. Jones, Odom, Davis & Politz, L.L.P.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2016No. 50,502-CAPublished

1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.

hln this action involving a reconventional and third-party demand alleging fraud as well as violations of the Louisiana Racketeering Act,1 M. Carl Rice, William Ken-dig, and Rice & Kendig (“R & K”) appeal a judgment dismissing their motion for sanctions.

We affirm.

FACTS

Most of the background for this matter can be found in this court’s prior opinions in Skannal v. Bamburg, 44,820 (La.1/27/10), 33 So.3d 227, writ denied, 2010-0707 (La.5/28/10), 36 So.3d 254, and Skannal v. Jones Odom Davis & Politz, L.L.P., 48,016 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/13), 124 So.3d 500, writ denied, 2013-2887 (La.2/21/14), 134…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. SandersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Diesel Driving Academy, Inc. v. FerrierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Skannal v. BamburgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Skannall v. Bamburg, 2010-0707 (La. 5/28/10)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  5. Sanchez v. Liberty LloydsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API