Legal Opinion

The Vaderland

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 29, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Upon the motion for a rehearing in the above case, (18 Fed. Bep. 733,) it does not appear to the court upon the evidence taken that any error was committed in holding the white damage to be within the exception of the bill of lading under the term “rust,” in the absence of any evidence of tho restriction of the meaning of that word by commercial usage to the rust of iron. If the court is in error in that respect, an appeal to the circuit court is the appropriate remedy. So far as the supposed error of the court rests upon the alleged commercial use of the word “rust” in a restricted sense, if…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. The AstorianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  2. The Eva D. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
  3. Di Meglio v. GiagoniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API