Legal Opinion

Wood v. Faut

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Mackinac. (Steere, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood, J\

The declaration in this case is on the common counts in assumpsit, accompanied by a bill of particulars consisting of three items. The plea is the general issne with notice of former suit and adjudication of the same matter in bar.- The case originated in justice’s court where, the plaintiff had judgment, and on appeal to the circuit the plaintiff again obtained judgment, and the proceedings therein had are before us on error for review. The cause was tried before the circuit judge without a jury, and the case comes up on special findings; the record containing also a bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. RohrbackMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Lyman v. BecannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bacon v. SchepflinIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Remley v. MeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Hatch v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hogle v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API