Legal Opinion · Dissent
McDonnell v. Roy E. Beatty & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 20, 1992No. A91A2131Published
1DissentBirdsong, Presiding Judge
The facts in evidence are not as they have been perceived by the majority and the legal analysis is, in our opinion, incorrect.
The majority has failed to follow the rule in Beasley v. Beasley, 260 Ga. 419, 420 (396 SE2d 222) as to construction of the evidence on appeal of these cases. The deposition of Mr. Roy E. Beatty, Sr., establishes that defendant corporation, of which he is the sole shareholder, bought this airplane with Dr. Lacey’s money, in January 1989, at the request of Mr. Beatty’s personal friend Dr. Lacey, and for the use of Dr. and Mrs. Lacey in their personal affairs, which, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Shellenberger v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Davis Metals, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.