Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1924No. 14881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where a distress warrant and a common-law action for rent were both filed on the same day, and a plea in abatement setting up the pendency of the other suit was filed in each case by the defendant, and both cases were referred to an auditor with power to pass upon questions of law as well as of fact, and where the auditor ruled that both suits could not proceed simultaneously, that the plaintiff must elect, and where the plaintiff thereupon elected to proceed upon the distress warrant, the plaintiff cannot afterwards be heard to except on the ground that the finding of the auditor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Monk-Sloan Supply Co. v. Quitman Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Geer v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poole v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Swain v. Georgia Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Hales v. Sandersville Builders Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Spitzer v. Selig Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API