Legal Opinion

Higby Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Utica

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamons, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) on the ground that the pleading fails to state a cause of action.

The plaintiff’s complaint seeks to recover damages allegedly sustained by the plaintiff corporation as a result of claimed negligent acts of the Common Council and the executive branch *406of the defendant municipality. The basis for.the motion is that the negligence complained of is that of the City Clerk of the City of Utica and since his actions involved a purely governmental function, no action will lie against it for the negligence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. McCrink v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Holmes v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Meistinsky v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Holmes v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drago v. BuonagurioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Quigley v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Syrang Aero Club, Inc. v. Foremost InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Ghee v. Washington Mutual Bank F.A.New York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API