Legal Opinion
State v. Houston
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1927No. 3043PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLÉY, J.
The appellants, J. Houston and John Houston, were convicted of assault with intent to murder D. D. 'Dodson. The Floustons lived on a farm in Curry county. Dodson was a deputy sheriff of said county. There had been strong language used between Dodson and the elder Houston. There were charges and counter charges between the parties, and it is enough to say that an ill feeling existed between them prior to any physical demonstration. Afterwards Dodson came to the home premises of Houston for the declared purpose of gathering wild plums. Houston claimed that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pettine v. Territory of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Leverich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. RogersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. ArdoinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. HobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.