Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. . Ballard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil action, heard at June Term, 1893, of Durham Superior Court, before Bryan, J., the nature of which, and the facts connected therewith, sufficiently appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Clark. Appeal by the National Exchange Bank, of 'Dallas, et al.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The tenth class, into which the judgment admits the appellee creditors, is thus described in the deed of assignment: “To J. 8. Lockhart, or the holders thereof, the amount of all notes and drafts on which J. S. Lockhart is bound as surety, or acceptor, or endorser for W. T. Blackwell, all the same amounting to about thirty-five thousand dollars, and having been done for the benefit and accommodation of W. T. Blackwell.” On none of the paper set out in the judg- meat does J. S. Lockhart appear as “surety, or acceptor, or endorser for W. T. Blackwell,” nor. does it appear that they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southerland v. . FremontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Oates v. . LillySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Atlantic Trust & Banking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Dunn v. . Beaman &8212 No. 2Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Haywood v. . RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API