Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Balla v. Wreski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1949No. Appeal, 32PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Relatrix, by a series of orders in this habeas corpus proceeding, has had the custody of her daughter, now eight years old, and her four-year-old son for more than two years, subject to the father’s limited right of visitation. It is the intent of the present order to permit her to take the children to her newly-established home in California with thé right in the respondent to have the children for one month each summer at Mount Pocono in this State. The order however puts the burden on him of arranging for their transportation to and from California at his own expense if…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Firestone v. FirestoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fortunes v. ManosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Keller v. KellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lamberson v. BatykoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McTighe v. LindsaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davidyan v. DavidyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Heller v. YellinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. McCourt v. MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Skurat v. GearhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Gartner v. GartnerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API