Legal Opinion

State v. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin B. Stecher, J.

On April 26, 1969 horse racing at Aqueduct Race Track in New York City came to a sudden halt and was not resumed until May 7, 1969, following the issuance of a preliminary injunction by a Justice of this court. The order was subsequently affirmed (33 AD2d 1006). The cessation, it is alleged in the complaint, was the result of an illegal boycott (General Business Law, § 340) organized by the Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, New York Division (HBPA), which, with its officers, were named as defendants in this action. The Attorney-General seeks a permanent injunction under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Franklin v. ConnelieNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Community Board No. 3 v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API