Legal Opinion

Corbett v. South Carolina Department of Youth Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 24, 1992No. 23581Published

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The sole issue we address in this appeal is whether damage or destruction to a prosthesis which is a substitute for a natural body part and attached to the body at the time of the accident is compensable under workers’ compensation when the accident is attenuated with other physical injury. We hold it is and affirm.

FACTS

The facts are uncontroverted. Mary Corbett’s dentures were destroyed in an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment. Mary Corbett was an employee of the Department of Youth Services. Two of the “clients” were involved in an altercation which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. EAGLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Baker v. Pittsburgh Forgings Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Lail v. RICHLAND WRECKING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API