Legal Opinion

City of Cedar Rapids v. Young

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Linn District Court. — Hon. Wm. G-. Thompson, Judge. Action in equity to enjoin defendant from obstructing a street in plaintiff city. Decree for defendant,, from which plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

In the absence of any reproduction in the abstract of any of the maps or plats referred to in the *553•evidence (save a plat at the end of appellee’s amendment to the abstract, which is not, so far as we can see, referred to in the record itself, and does not purport to be a reproduction of any plat properly in the record), we are compelled to determine this case largely on the view of the evidence which is taken by the counsel for the two parties, respectively. We think, however, that we shall have ¡no difficulty in stating facts . practically conceded by both parties, on which a conclusion may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Onstott v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Duncombe v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Hanger v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. City of Columbus JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Park Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. City of Cedar Rapids v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Mettler v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Des Moines Independent School District v. McClureSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API