Legal Opinion

In Re Fruchter

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 12, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, a member of the Bar of this State, is presently under suspension by order of this Court. See: In re Fruchter, 64 N. J. 435 (1974). Following his suspension, an ethics complaint was filed against respondent charging him with the conversion of funds of the Estate of Meyer Gilenson, deceased. At about the same time a criminal accusation was filed against respondent by the Prosecutor of Essex County charging him with the embezzlement of $158,723 from said estate.

On May 14, 1975 respondent pleaded guilty to the accusation and has been sentenced. By letter dated May 28, 1975 he has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re FruchterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API