Legal Opinion

Bomford v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court. The Hon. Felix J. Batsox, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice English

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Bomford and Shu-mard, partners in the practice of medicine, against Marshall Grimes, as administrator of John Booth, deceased, in the Sebastian Circuit Court.

There are three counts in the declaration:

The first cowit alleged that Booth, the deceased, in his lifetime, was indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $466 50, for medical services, &c.

The second cowvt alleges a like indebtedness of Booth, in his lifetime, to the plaintiffs, and a promise to pay the same by the defendant, as his administrator, after his death.

The third cowvt alleges, that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tucker v. GraceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Miller v. Oil City Iron WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Griggs v. NadeauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Massey v. DokeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. McDaniel v. ParksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API