Legal Opinion

Rawson v. Lyon

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

There is no question that the ordinary practice in admiralty has long been to require a stipulation for costs from a respondent on entering his appearance and answering in an action in personam. Judge Betts, in his book on Admiralty Practice, says: “This stipulation must be filed when a defendant comes in to defend, although the first process was a citation and not a warrant.” Page 40. This is in accordance with the ancient practice. Clerke, Praxis, tits. 5, 11; Pharo v. Smith, 18 How. Pr. 47. When suits were commenced by warrant, rule 17 of this court expressly required bail to *832be taken for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pharo v. SmithUnited States District Court · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. The Pere Marquette 18District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API