Legal Opinion
Julia v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 27, 2004No. 02-4376PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Anna M. Julia (“Julia”) appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees, Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (“Bridgestone”), Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.1984 Retirement Plan (“the Plan”), and Delmar F. Lohr (“Lohr”), Julia’s ex-husband, partially on the pleadings and partially after a motion for summary judgment. Julia’s claims under ERISA arose from a miscalculation by Bridge-stone of the amount owed Julia under the divorce agreement between her and Lohr and the subsequent overpayment of Julia and underpayment of Lohr.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John T. Gore v. El Paso Energy Corporation Long Term Disability Plan and El Paso Energy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Gore v. El Paso Energy CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Karen Briggs v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Karen Briggs v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019