Legal Opinion

Chapin v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

The relator has not been licensed as an employing or master plumber in the city of Glens Falls. He does plumbing in said city, however, and holds Mmself out to the public as authorized to do it. He filed with the appellant plans for certain plumbing work which he proposed to do in a certain building in said city. Appellant refused to act- upon Ms application upon the ground that the respondent was not a licensed master plumber of the city of Glens Falls and, therefore, could not execute the plumbing work which the plans called for, because of the claimed prohibitions of the General…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. City of Hudson v. FlemmingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Glens Falls v. ChapinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Stepski v. HarfordNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API