Legal Opinion
Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 2015No. 13-55575PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Dissent by Judge BEA
ORDER
Judges Silverman and Quist have voted to grant panel rehearing. Judge Bea has voted to deny rehearing. The petition for rehearing en banc is now moot. The Opinion filed July 6, 2015, and appearing at 792 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir.2015), is withdrawn. The Superseding Opinion and Dissent are filed contemporaneously with this order. The parties may file additional petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
In the present appeal, we must decide whether the following scenario constitutes trademark…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- The Ohio State Univ. v. Redbubble, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Skechers USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Stone Creek, Inc. v. Omnia Italian Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Charles Fox v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Lerner & Rowe Pc v. Brown Engstrand & Shely LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.