Legal Opinion

People v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prior to sentencing, the court noted that defendant’s Probation Officer had informed the court that defendant had not regularly reported as required by the bargain. At sentencing, the prosecutor indicated his "understanding” that defendant had failed to report. Defense counsel, however, stated that defendant had reported on each date, as directed by the Probation Officer. The court failed to conduct further inquiry to satisfy itself that defendant had violated that condition of the bargain (see, CPL 400.10 [3]; People v Faulkner, 182 AD2d 1025, lv dismissed 80 NY2d 830; cf., People v Outley,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. OutleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. FaulknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. ShabazzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. SampsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. McClemoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API