Legal Opinion

Ardrey et al. v. The City of New York et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 5, 2026No. 1:22-cv-10660Unknown

1Opinion

te, City Defendants' motion for a fi: NF 5%, teleconference is DENIED without i ‘jean = J prejudice. Based on the Court's review ie ere the discovery disputes, the issue regar See depositions does not yet seem ripe for t ey Er oy Cc ' . wate ourt's review. To that end, the parties are directed to THE CiTy OF NEW YoR meet and confer regarding this dispute STEVEN BANKS LAW DEPARTME August 13, 2026. To the extent that t Corporation Counsel NEW YORK. NY 10007 parties have unresolved issues, by Au 20, 2026, they may file letter briefing \ the Court in accordance with this Cour individual rules. By…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Lederman v. New York City Department of Parks & RecreationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Moriah v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Murray v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API