Peabody v. Sanitary District
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor
dissenting: In my opinion the contract entered into for the construction of the sewer, between the Sanitary District of Chicago and the Illinois Improvement and Ballast Company, is not rendered invalid or void by virtue of section 3 of chapter 102, of Cahill’s Statutes, on the ground that Schmidt, the treasurer of the Sanitary District, was an officer and stockholder of the Improvement Company. That section, which was enacted in 1872, provides that: “It shall not be lawful for any person, now or hereafter holding any office, either by election or appointment * *…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Investigation of the Financial AffairsNew York Supreme Court · 1908