Lloyd v. City of Toledo
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In our judgment, the facts recited above, wl\ich are conceded by the pleadings, show that the hospital was a municipal institution maintained and operated at the expense of the city in the interest of and for the preservation of the public health, and the municipality in conducting the institution is performing a governmental function. The situation in this respect is not altered by the mere fact that there were some patients who paid for the accommodations and service. The rule is well settled that a municipal corporation is not liable for the torts of its officers and employes engaged in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Calomeris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- City of McAllen v. GartmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- State v. Great Plains of Kiowa County, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Holt v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.