Legal Opinion
Jeffcott v. Aetna Ins.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
The respondent has filed exceptions to the first, second and third causes of action of the libel. It has also excepted to interrogatories Nos. 14 to 39, inclusive, attached to the libel.
The suit is brought to recover on two policies of marine insurance covering the yacht “Dauntless” belonging to the libellant. One of the policies was a hull policy, the other a disbursements policy. The yacht, while laid up and out of commission at New London, Connecticut, was severely damaged in the hurricane of September 21, 1938.
The libellant, after an examination of the vessel,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Patapsco Insurance Company v. SouthgateSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Bradlie v. the Maryland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Orient Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Royal Exch. Assur. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- Chicago S. S. Lines v. United States Lloyds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jeffcott v. ætna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Jeffcott v. Ætna Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941