Legal Opinion

In re Ehrlich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2002. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany.

Petitioner moves for respondent’s immediate suspension from the practice of law pending consideration of disciplinary charges against him upon the ground that he is guilty of professional misconduct threatening the public interest (see 22 NYCRR 806.4 [f]). Petitioner has filed a petition of charges accusing respondent of serious misconduct, including falsifying and providing a client with a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and providing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re EhrlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re PlimptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re PlimptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API