Legal Opinion

Bollinger v. Eckert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1827PublishedCited by 2 opinions

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas,of Cumberland county, in which the plaintiff in error, George Bollinger, for the use of James Todd and others, executors of Mary Patterson, deceased, was plaintiff below, and George Eckert defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Huston, J.

This was an action on a parol promise to guaranty the payments of certain judgments which had been transferred by Eckert to Bollinger in part payment for a house sold.

There were articles of agreement drawn between Bollinger and E.ckert, respecting the sale of a house, &e., by James Todd, as the scrivener: Todd, by assignment of the judgment to him, as one of *423the executors of Mary Patterson, was become interested. The articles of agreement were supposed to have been lost. Bollinger was released from all responsibility, bythe plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frederick v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caulk v. EverlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Morrison v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API